<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has &#8216;Rolling Stone&#8217; Lost it&#8217;s Edge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuffwhy.com/wpmu/thelinebreak/2008/12/13/has-rolling-stone-lost-its-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuffwhy.com/wpmu/thelinebreak/2008/12/13/has-rolling-stone-lost-its-edge/</link>
	<description>Reviews of Today's Films, Literature, and Tunes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:28:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mrpeebles</title>
		<link>http://stuffwhy.com/wpmu/thelinebreak/2008/12/13/has-rolling-stone-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrpeebles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffwhy.com/wpmu/thelinebreak/?p=54#comment-9</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s the deal: magazines target their covers to newsstand buyers, who are often very different than the people who subscribe. Most of the content in any given magazine is targeted, however, at you, the subscriber. So give magazines a break about their covers -- they need newsstand sales to survive, and Britney and Brad are a lot more popular than TV on the Radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s the deal: magazines target their covers to newsstand buyers, who are often very different than the people who subscribe. Most of the content in any given magazine is targeted, however, at you, the subscriber. So give magazines a break about their covers &#8212; they need newsstand sales to survive, and Britney and Brad are a lot more popular than TV on the Radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
